Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT 5.1 Benchmark: Speed, Cost & Coding Test (2026)
Direct benchmark comparison: Claude 4 Sonnet vs GPT 5.1. Compare SWE-bench verified scores, MATH-500 accuracy, token pricing per million, and context windows.
The battle for AI dominance reaches a new high as Anthropic introduces Claude 4 Sonnet to compete head-to-head with OpenAI’s flagship GPT 5.1.
In this comprehensive evaluation, RankLLMs breaks down performance benchmarks across software engineering, reasoning, latency, and pricing.
Claude 4 Sonnet wins for software engineering (72.4% SWE-bench), while GPT 5.1 leads on math reasoning & input token cost.
- Best for Coding: Claude 4 Sonnet (superior multi-file refactoring & lower hallucination rates).
- Best for Math & Logic: GPT 5.1 (95.8% MATH-500 score & $2.50/1M input pricing).
- Context Window: Claude 4 Sonnet (200K / 1M beta) vs GPT 5.1 (128K).
Benchmark Highlights
1. SWE-bench Verified (Software Engineering)
- Claude 4 Sonnet: 72.4%
- GPT 5.1: 70.1%
Claude 4 Sonnet demonstrates superior multi-file refactoring accuracy, fewer hallucinated dependencies, and better comprehension of legacy codebases.
2. Math & Logic Reasoning (MATH-500)
- Claude 4 Sonnet: 94.2%
- GPT 5.1: 95.8%
GPT 5.1 maintains a tight edge in formal mathematical proofs and symbolic logic calculations.
Token Pricing Comparison
| Model | Input (per 1M tokens) | Output (per 1M tokens) | Context Window |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude 4 Sonnet | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K (1M beta) |
| GPT 5.1 | $2.50 | $10.00 | 128K |
Recommendation
- Choose Claude 4 Sonnet for complex codebase refactoring, tool call reliability, and long technical documents.
- Choose GPT 5.1 for rapid structured JSON generation, cost optimization on high-volume inputs, and math heavy logic.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Which model is better for coding, Claude 4 Sonnet or GPT 5.1?
Claude 4 Sonnet is superior for software engineering and multi-file codebase refactoring, scoring 72.4% on SWE-bench Verified compared to GPT 5.1’s 70.1%.
Is Claude 4 Sonnet more expensive than GPT 5.1?
Yes, Claude 4 Sonnet costs $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output tokens, whereas GPT 5.1 costs $2.50 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output tokens.
Which model has a larger context window?
Claude 4 Sonnet supports a 200,000 token context window (with 1 million token extended beta), while GPT 5.1 offers a 128,000 token context window.
Was this benchmark report helpful?
Thank you for your feedback! We update our benchmarks weekly based on developer input.
Recommended Reading

Lucky Yaduvanshi(luckyyaduvanshi.in →)
Founder of RankLLMs • AI Researcher & Software Engineer focusing on LLM benchmarking, DevOps, and autonomous coding agents.